![]() ![]() Otherwise, finding someone in your local community is best. A source for free labor - You'll be expected to volunteer your time or pay.A resource for people to learn new things about editing.A place where people can seek feedback on their work (please use the monthly threads).A place where people can ask questions about editing, from storytelling to technique to technical tricks.Our Wiki with Common questions/answers What We Are: We expect everyone to be civil and generally not act like a jerk. Posting your "video editing services" (No, not free either)īe respectful.Have a question about: Monthly thread "What software should I use?" Monthly thread for "What hardware should I use?" Monthly Feedback on your edit with the caveat that you need to comment on someone else's thread. Jumpcut has angel funding by Westlake Venture Partners and Great Oaks Capital.This reddit is to ask basic and intermediate questions about editing, primarily for home and personal use. Both of these services will be very useful for creating a single video from a group event where lots of different people are recording video – a wedding, for example. Jumpcut has slightly better editing features, and Motionbox’s deep tagging is a definite feature win. Overall, the service is eerily similar to Motionbox. A paid service will be available soon in the $5/month range, and Jumpcut will also have a client install available to allow users to do some of the editing and transcoding work before uploading it to the Jumpcut server. ![]() The service is currently free and allows uploads of up to 50 MB (YouTube allows 100MB). Unlike Motionbox, Jumpcut does not have a deep tagging feature, although Mike Folger says it is being built and that “it’s fairly straightforward using the Flash development tools”. Jumpcuts provides code snippets to allow video playback from blogs and other websites as well. Like YouTube, finished videos can be kept private, shared or made public. Check it out by clicking “remix” on this video screen. They also allow a number of “transition” features as effects. Sound files can be added to either overwrite existing audio or mix in with it. Any video can be cloned (unless restricted by the publisher), and other clips can be added to the cloned video. It’s editing features, also using Flash, are better than what I saw with Motionbox. Jumpcut, as the newest entrant, has some really spectacular features, that should encourage video mashing between users. With these last two, the editing occurs online, and therefore facilitates editing by a group on a shared video. Motionbox and Jumpcut don’t, although Jumpcut says they’ll have one as an option soon. Grouper and VideoEgg require a client download to use the service. Included in this group is Grouper, Motionbox, Jumpcut and, to some extent, YouTube. The second group does what YouTube does, but also has some basic editing features. They are dealing with this in two ways – by degrading the quality of the flash video files to reduce file size, and by raising another $8m from Sequoia, raising the total to $11.5 million. YouTube is free but has very real bandwidth costs from showing these videos. It’s working so well, in fact, that it raises questions on their business model. The goal is to get video and page views, and it’s working. The first is the YouTube crowd and its dozens of clones, which allow easy uploading of files which are then transcoded into flash, and tagging of those files. In my mind there are now two distinct types of video sharing services. San Francisco based stealth startup Jumpcut, founded by Mike Folgner and Ryan Cunningham, just launched minutes ago. No sooner did I proclaim Motionbox the best online video sharing service (mostly for its editing and deep tagging tools), than a new contender arrives on the scene. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |